Members to give notice of any Personal or Prejudicial Interest and the nature of that Interest relating to any item on the Agenda in accordance with the adopted Code of Conduct.

Councillor Chalkin declared a Personal Interest in Application 104799/FUL/21 (Hale Country Club, 47 Clay Lane, Timperley) as he is a member of the Country Club.

Councillor Welton declared a Personal Interest in Application 104799/FUL/21 (Hale Country Club, 47 Clay Lane, Timperley) being a Board Member.

To receive and, if so determined, to approve as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting held on 20^th January, 2022.

              RESOLVED:  That the Minutes of the meeting held on 20^th January, 2022, be approved as a correct record subject to the following amendment to Minute number 62 – Declarations of Interest.

              Councillor Morgan declared that he did not have an interest in Application 106581/FUL/21 (Woodheys Primary School, Meadway, Sale), with his previous employer being a heat pump business.

A maximum of 15 minutes will be allocated to public questions submitted in writing to Democratic Services (democratic.services@trafford.gov.uk) by 4pm two working days prior to the meeting. Questions must be within the remit of the Committee or be relevant to items appearing on the agenda and will be submitted in the order in which they were received.

No questions were submitted.

To consider the attached report of the Head of Planning and Development, tabled at the meeting.

The Head of Planning and Development submitted a report informing Members of additional information received regarding applications for planning permission to be determined by the Committee.

              RESOLVED:  That the report be received and noted.

To consider the attached reports of the Head of Planning and Development, for the following applications.

The Head of Planning and Development submitted a report concerning an application for planning permission for the erection of first floor side and part single part two storey rear extensions.

It was moved and seconded that planning permission be refused.

The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.

              RESOLVED:  That planning permission be refused for the following reasons:-

(1)           The proposed development, by reason of its scale, massing and design would have a detrimental and overbearing impact on the streetscene and surrounding area and by reason of the massing articulation and roof design appear as a contrived development that would harm the character of the existing property and wider area, contrary to SPD 4, A Guide for Designing House Extensions and Alterations, Policy L7 of the Trafford Core Strategy and the National Planning Policy Framework.

(2)           The proposed development, by reason of its scale, massing, design and proximity to the side boundaries of the site would have an unacceptable impact on the residential amenity the occupiers of no. 10 and 14 Rossett Avenue could reasonable expect to enjoy, due to the overbearing and overshadowing impact of the development, as such the proposed development is contrary to SPD 4, A Guide for Designing House Extensions and Alterations, Policy L7 of the Trafford Core Strategy and the National Planning Policy Framework.

The Head of Planning and Development submitted a report concerning an application for planning permission for the erection of two storey side/rear extension, alterations to front elevation including two storey front extension and other external alterations.

It was moved and seconded that planning permission be refused.

The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.

              RESOLVED:  That planning permission be refused for the following reasons:- 

(1)            The proposed development, would lead to an overbearing and overshadowing impact to no. 2 Chiltern Drive by reason of its scale, massing and proximity to the side boundary with this property. It would therefore have an unacceptable impact on the residential amenity the occupiers of no. 2 Chiltern Drive could reasonably expect to enjoy. As such the proposed development is contrary to SPD 4, A Guide for Designing House Extensions and Alterations, Policy L7 of the Trafford Core Strategy and the National Planning Policy Framework.