To consider a report of the Head of Regulatory Services.
Minutes:
The Head of Regulatory Services submitted a report informing members of an application for the grant of a premises licence for So Marrakech, 25 Market Street, Altrincham, WA14 1QS which had attracted representations from local residents.
Representations were made against the application by local residents and in support of the application by the applicant Miss A Damoussi.
RESOLVED:
(1) That the application for the grant of a premises licence be granted subject to compliance with the conditions outlined in the decision notice.
(2) That the issue of the licence be delegated to the Head of Regulatory Services.
LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE DECISION NOTICE
Sub Committee Councillor S J Haughey
Members: Councillor E L Hirst
Councillor J Holden
Applicant: Anissa Damoussi
Type of Licence: Grant of a Premises Licence: So Marrakesh ,25 Market Street, Altrincham WA14 1QS.
Representors: Environmental Health
Nasreen Ali
Local Residents
Sara Coulson
Marc Dightam
Eleanor Hotchkiss
Parties Present: Applicant
Anissa Damoussi
Local Residents
Nicola Bradshaw
Sara Coulson
Eleanor Hotchkiss
Officers
Ursula Smith – Licensing Officer
Pelumi Coker - Legal Assistant Corporate Governance
James Parry – Legal Officer
Natalie Owen – Democratic Officer
Date of Hearing: 19th December 2024
Time Commence: 6.30 p.m.
Time Terminated: 7:00 p.m.
LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE DECISION
The Sub-Committee determined to grant a premises licence in respect of the premises known as “So Marrakesh, 25 Market Street, Altrincham WA14 1QS subject to the conditions shown in the schedule to this document.
LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE’S REASONS
We had the benefit of receiving the Licensing Officer’s Report, a copy of the application and supporting documents and written representations from Nasreen Ali on behalf of Environmental Health and from Nicola Bradshaw, Sara Coulson, Marc Dightam and Eleanor Hotchkiss.
We were satisfied that the application had been properly made and that the applicant had complied with the Rules that regulated the advertising of the application.
We were also satisfied that the representations we have referred to above were received in time and were properly made so as to require us to consider them.
We were advised that the Applicant had agreed to conditions proposed by Environmental Health in advance of the hearing and on the Applicant consenting to have those conditions endorsed upon any licence we might grant, Ms. Ali’s representation was withdrawn.
We had the benefit of hearing from the remaining Representors who appeared before us. There was a common theme within those representations which was that the existing businesses and licensed premises within the location of these premises generates noise and a degree of nuisance. The Representors were all concerned that a grant of a further licence to the Applicant would increase the incidence of such nuisance.
The Representor’s stated that there was already too much noise in the area which prevented them from sleeping. Another said that they were worried that patrons of the Applicant’s premises might urinate in the entrances to the residential buildings above the retail premises and press the door buzzers. There was a further complaint of existing rowdiness in the street.
We heard that the premises have operated as a café for several years and for some time when the applicant was the proprietor of them. We noted that none of the Representors attributed any of their complaints to the operation of the Applicant’s premises.
We noted that the Applicant does not seek authorisation for the provision of regulated entertainment and in particular the playing of live or recorded music, which would have the capacity to generate noise nuisance.
We noted that the conditions agreed with Environmental Health imposed much greater protection from noise nuisance that has hitherto been the case. Those conditions include provisions relating to noise management and the protection of noise sensitive premises from noise nuisance.
In considering this application we are of course unable to do anything that would impact on any other premises where noise nuisance or anti-social behaviour might arise. If there are such premises that can be shown to be generating the type of nuisance complained of by the Representors, those matters should be referred to Environmental Health or Licensing Enforcement for investigation. In the absence of any such nuisance being abated, the Representors have the statutory right to seek a review of the premises licence of the licence of any premises causing such a nuisance.
In such circumstances, and whilst we took note of the representations, we reminded ourselves that we must consider this application on its own merits. In doing so we are required to apply the statutory provisions, the licensing objectives and our own Council’s policy and determine the application. We have done so.
We do not consider that the objections could properly be attributed to the past operation of these premises.
We were of the opinion that the use of the outside area of the premises which is sought to be licensed does have the capacity to cause noise nuisance to those who live immediately above the licensed premises and absent any other method of abating any noise nuisance from that area we believe the external part of the licensed area should not be used for the purpose of the retail sale of alcohol or any regulated entertainment after 21:00 and should be completely closed at 21:30 each night. Additionally, doors and windows that lead to that area should be closed after 21:30 to avoid the escape of noise from the premises.
We also noted the Applicant’s undertaking to install appropriate noise suppression materials within the premises as required to address any noise nuisance and in the light of that undertaking, we impose a condition that where that the applicant shall install such measures.
We were satisfied that with the addition of those conditions the proposed conditions were sufficient to mitigate concerns about nuisance.
We noted the absence of representations from Greater Manchester Police in respect of any risk of crime and disorder and concluded that there was no evidence to suggest that operation of these premises had or would contribute to crime and disorder in the locality.
No concerns have been expressed to us that the operation of the premises would place the safety of children in jeopardy.
Accordingly, we determined that the mandatory and additional conditions were sufficient to promote the licensing objectives and accordingly we resolved to GRANT THE APPLICATION subject to the mandatory and discretionary conditions shown in the schedule to this document.
RIGHT OF APPEAL
The Applicant or any person who has made representations in respect of this application may appeal against our decision to the Manchester Magistrates’ Court, Crown Square, Manchester M60 1PR, telephone 0330 808 4407 email: GMManMags@justice.gov.uk.
Any such appeal must be commenced within 21 days of the receipt of this notice. A court fee may be payable, and you may become liable for the costs incurred by any opposing party, should your appeal be dismissed.
SCHEDULE
OPERATIONAL HOURS:
Opening Hours:
Monday to Sunday: 09.00 – 23.00
Retail Sale of Alcohol for consumption On the Premises
Monday to Sunday: 12.00 – 22.30
CONDITIONS
Any mandatory conditions which must be included under the Licensing Act 2003, together with the following conditions offered by the Applicant and agreed by the Sub Committee:
Supporting documents: