Venue: Committee Room 2 and 3, Trafford Town Hall, Talbot Road, Stretford, M32 0TH
Contact: John Addison Governance Manager
No. | Item |
---|---|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Members to give notice of any interest and the nature of that interest relating to any item on the agenda in accordance with the adopted Code of Conduct. Minutes: |
|
QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC A maximum of 1 minutes will be allocated to public questions submitted in writing to Democratic Services (democratic.service@trafford.gov.uk) by 4.pm on the working day prior to the meeting. Question must be within the remit of the Committee or be relevant to items appearing on the agenda and will be submitted in the order in which they were received.
Minutes: No questions from members of the public were received. |
|
To receive and, if so determined, to agree as a correct and true record the Minutes of the meeting held on 25th July 2024.
Minutes: RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting on 25 July 2024 be agreed as an accurate record and signed by the Chair. |
|
MENTAL HEALTH TRUST - IMPROVEMENT JOURNEY UPDATE To receive a report from the Chief Strategy Officer. Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee received a report from the Director of Improvement at Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GMMH).
The Committee was informed of the three strategic priorities within the Improvement Plan, which consisted of recovery, governance, and aspiration and strategy. The Director of Improvement reported that GMMH was moving from an improvement plan to a recovery plan, wherein changes to governance arrangements were due to commence from the 2025 calendar year.
A Member requested more information about the three deliverables within the Improvement Plan that were not progressing according to plan; the Director of Improvement clarified that work for these items was progressing but had missed their original deadline date, and included the Clinical Induction Programme and the Clinical and Care Strategy. Areas where progress has been slower than expected were held to account through internal governance arrangements.
The Associate Director of Quality and AHP informed the Committee, with regard to professional standards, that as part of the Visible Leadership Programme, senior leaders were more visible on inpatient wards and engaging with staff both during the daytime and out of hours, to ensure that professional standards were maintained at all times. This was supported by the Culture of Care Programme, which focused on delivering compassionate and trauma-informed care.
In response to a question from a Member regarding areas within the service which were under strain, the Associate Director of Operations informed the Committee that the Memory Assessment Service was experiencing delays owing to demand. Quality reviews were underway to establish how to address pressures on teams in both the short- and long-term. The Director of Improvement discussed national pressures, such as ADHD diagnosis, which were present in Trafford and GMMH, but noted that this was aided by improved business intelligence at GMMH and that patients waiting for care were now proactively managed.
The Vice-Chair expressed congratulations on the progress that had been made in the Improvement Plan and asked about the strategies in place for discharging patients. The Associate Director of Operations referred to Living Well Trafford, which supported patients whose need was above primary care yet did not meet the threshold for secondary care. This service also assisted patients upon discharge and has created capacity in teams.
In response to a question on diversity within GMMH, the Director of Transformation confirmed that data was being captured on the composition of workforce, with an improved staff offer including a broader range of staff networks and tailored programmes of health and wellbeing initiatives for staff with protected characteristics (where these had been disclosed). With regard to service users, the Committee was informed of the Service User Forum which championed accessible care.
A Member asked about the planning and funding of the continuing professional development (CPD) for staff. The Associate Director of Quality and AHP outlined the CPD offer of compulsory training and the additional funding from Health Education England for nurses who were undertaking additional training such as prescribing qualifications, for example. Appraisals were reported at being 80% with robust ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |
|
To receive a report from the Deputy Place Lead. Minutes: The Chair welcomed Gareth James, Deputy Place Lead for Health and Care Integration and Cathy O’Driscoll, Associate Director of Delivery and Transformation, NHS Greater Manchester to the Meeting. The Officers outlined the Urgent Care review findings and recommendations for Scrutiny to consider.
The Chair reminded Members that the request on Health Scrutiny Members tonight was to articulate if they consider that the changes proposed in the review resulted in a substantial change in service provision and, if so, articulate the reasons for this. It was noted that any views provided by Members would inform a conversation with NHS England about the level of further work and consultation required.
The Associate Director of Delivery & Transformation (Trafford) provided the Committee with a summary of the seven priority areas within Urgent Care Review.
A Member asked whether the wording of Priority Area 7 (‘Consider how we use Altrincham Minor Injuries Unit’) ought to be reconsidered with reference to the phrase ‘continual relocation of services to the Wythenshawe Hospital site’ (report p. 8), as this could have been construed as plans for additional service relocations. The Deputy Place Lead for Health and Care Integration noted this as a helpful suggestion.
Members discussed how the future use of the two rooms made vacant by the relocation of Altrincham Minor Injuries Unit would be an important area for public engagement discussions if Priority Area 7 returned for consultation (Gateway 2). The Deputy Place Lead for Health and Care Integration confirmed that this would come through Health Scrutiny if further consultation was required.
The Associate Director of Delivery & Transformation (Trafford) informed the Committee that Priority Areas 1-6 could be implemented immediately if the recommendations were approved as the infrastructure and providers were already in place.
A Member asked whether out of hours provision would also extend to pharmacies in Partington. The Associate Director of Delivery & Transformation (Trafford) explained to the Committee that pharmacies were not directly commissioned but rather independent contractors; discussions were taking place to extend opening hours for pharmacies in Partington, though Trafford was generally well supplied with pharmacies.
The Committee was informed that a 24-hour facility was not available within the Trafford borough which was the reason for the Wythenshawe Hospital site for Priority Area 7 in the report; face-to-face appointments were to be available at Trafford General Hospital until 11:00pm, with appointments at the Wythenshawe site from 11:00pm until 8:00am for this reason of accessibility.
Several Members stressed the impact of the relocation of services from Altrincham Minor Injuries Unit (Priority Area 7), particularly for residents in the south of the Borough, with added pressures on urgent care from the additional population who were due to move to the Borough’s new housing developments. The Deputy Place Lead for Health and Care Integration responded that the impact on healthcare provision was factored into planning decisions and that they worked closely with Trafford Council colleagues regarding the health impact of housing developments.
The Vice-Chair noted that the urgent care provision was comprehensive in the Borough ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
URGENT BUSINESS (IF ANY) Any other item or items (not likely to disclose "exempt information") which, by reason of special circumstances (to be specified), the Chairman of the meeting is of the opinion should be considered at this meeting as a matter of urgency.
Minutes: There was no urgent business to discuss.
|